?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Hi it's me again, - DEVIANTARTSNARK © DOCTORSCIENCE 2010-2011 — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
DEVIANTARTSNARK © DOCTORSCIENCE 2010-2011

[ website | START HERE ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Hi it's me again, [Apr. 2nd, 2013|10:50 am]
DEVIANTARTSNARK © DOCTORSCIENCE 2010-2011
deviantartsnark
[teufelsengel]
[mood |sleep-deprived and sad]

Just look at this and tell me, at a glance, that it doesn't look like those horses are humping.

I'm disappointed I couldn't report it and be rid of just a tiny fraction of the billions of tons of pony shit constantly being spread all over deviantart.

If that wasn't enough for you I just now happened upon a guy who apparently has a bizarre fetish for cartoon gloves and feet. And posts lots of screencaps from animated films and comic books to prove it.

Yeah...
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: 000_hester_000
2013-04-02 07:09 pm (UTC)
DEM GLOVES.

Okay, I don't know either.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: megumi_kitten
2013-04-02 08:12 pm (UTC)
Coming across someone's fetish album always makes me uncomfy.

when it's really..just super specific? It really gets me. i just want to ask what is it about the gloves? What makes it so hot?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: babybeluga2003
2013-04-03 02:38 am (UTC)
I always kind of love coming across the super specific things, haha. One of my favorite guys had a thing for cars trapped inside balloons.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: megumi_kitten
2013-04-03 03:05 am (UTC)
I'VE SEEN THAT GUY TOO!

It just makes me WONDER is all.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: bkatt500
2013-04-06 03:23 am (UTC)
Wasn't he posted here? Whenever any of my friends worry about having a weird fetish, I just link them to that guy.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: kerssido
2013-04-02 09:36 pm (UTC)
I found this in the second guy's favourites: (nsfwish?) http://riproarrex.deviantart.com/art/Alan-a-Dale-and-Robin-Hood-Of-Foxes-and-Fowl-283477098

that's...odd
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kharmii
2013-04-02 10:15 pm (UTC)
..wow.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: teufelsengel
2013-04-03 05:14 am (UTC)
... Why can't furries just keep their gross fetishy crap on FA...?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: butt_fluff
2013-04-05 02:08 am (UTC)
No words.
None.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: hm_yeah
2013-04-07 09:47 am (UTC)
buzzkill time. This ain't nothin'. at all.

Now, how about this one guy I'll never be able to remember - I think he was Mexican, his English was of the Babelfish dialect, and his particular fetish was for looney tunes characters, always three of them...

two having missionary sex in a closet or preferably in a coffin six feet under, and one that the lovers don't know about, happily jerking off in their general direction. He really liked the coffin variant of this.

Never mind how the watcher would know that the lovers were doing their thing in the small enclosed area, or how they got in the coffin in the first place.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: triplem
2013-04-04 01:22 am (UTC)
Hahaha man, what won't people fap to?

I don't get why DA doesn't count stuff like this as porn. There's having someone come across your work and fapping to it, and then there's deliberately setting up a resource for other people to fap to. I don't get why this is different from pictures of someone touching their junk, especially the foot-licking and shit.

Edited at 2013-04-04 01:28 am (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: bkatt500
2013-04-06 03:19 am (UTC)
I totally get why. It would make their rules as to what is porn much more confusing and arbitrary. Currently they are pretty straight-forward and objective, if penetration, genital contact, or bodily fluids are obviously shown, it's porn. If they changed it to something more subjective like 'single theme for purpose of arousal', it would cause a lot more confusion since while it's obvious in a case like this, there's going to be a lot of personal feeling and opinion going into the decision for many other cases. They already don't remove obvious porn that doesn't explicitly show penetration, fluids, or masturbation.
There's not really an easy, non-arbitrary way to make this stuff against the rules without also banning another artist's sheet of hand study-sketches or a close up of hands that has no fetishistic intention. As for the foot-licking, dA allows erotica, including licking and biting. Banning specifically feet would be a strangely specific rule. A smaller website might be able to have subjective arbitrary rules, but dA is just too large.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: triplem
2013-04-06 10:02 am (UTC)
True, true. Good point.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: butt_fluff
2013-04-05 02:09 am (UTC)
Somewhat off topic to the post itself but can't the last guy be reported since he literally stole all of that and didn't make it? It's copyrighted shit, isn't it?
(Reply) (Thread)
From: teufelsengel
2013-04-05 04:09 am (UTC)
Technically yes, but I'm not even sure if the admins give a damn about stolen art anymore, judging by what I've heard. Unless it's the actual artist who complains about their work being stolen, no 1 curr.

Could be wrong, dunno.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: gizzybiscuits
2013-04-06 05:09 pm (UTC)
Their FAQ on tracing seems...A bit weirdly open about it, implying that the actual artist has to file a DMCA thing (DMCA is a bit crappy anyway, I had someone use it to remove videogame screenshots I took of themselves being jackasses, wat. Wasn't on DA though).
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)